<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Gong Show - Latest Comments in Android&amp;#039;s Affordances</title><link>http://thegongshow.disqus.com/</link><description>The personal blog of Andrew Parker. Musings on tech, VC, music and current events.</description><atom:link href="https://thegongshow.disqus.com/android039s_affordances/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:01:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Android&amp;#039;s Affordances</title><link>http://thegongshow.tumblr.com/post/235939614#comment-22520918</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have yet to test the phone&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I will say this, as someone with a background in nude drawing (not engineering) affordance is partially about how the body extends itself into the environment, and how it pulls out of it as well.  Further, I have to question your argument- should affordance be based purely on just the mind- or is a mind to body paradigm, and if so,what layer of the mind are we talking about.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  The real question behind affordance, as always, is how the body interconnects with the object and the mind as a mediating layer.  I'm not anti a four button layout depending on how deeply the control of that four button layout is given.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hated the original apple mouse- two buttons are much better, because it extends my grip of one hand more fully.  In my perception of the screen the mouse is just a connector to whatever is going on there.  The keyboard is something else entirely.  Why would I want to split that function?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The option button may or may not fulfill that same role, depending on how it is used.  Did it extend your body into the media?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ShanaC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:01:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Android&amp;#039;s Affordances</title><link>http://thegongshow.tumblr.com/post/235939614#comment-22142811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@fromedome said it best on the keyboard. It so bad that vzw should  &lt;br&gt;just ship the Droid glued shut ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewparker</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:49:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Android&amp;#039;s Affordances</title><link>http://thegongshow.tumblr.com/post/235939614#comment-22142402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm still only a few days into my Droid test but i actually like the software (and VZW network).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just can't get comfortable with the hardware (keyboard &amp;amp; chunky form factor).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gonna give it some more time before making the call. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bijan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:35:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Android&amp;#039;s Affordances</title><link>http://thegongshow.tumblr.com/post/235939614#comment-22127770</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is my only complaint with Android.  It lacks the elegant interaction design of the iPhone.  I still think that 2010 will be the Adnroid year...but right now using it feels like throwing unix commands&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jonsteinberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:30:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>